Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kent Williams v. Leeflang, et al
as 22-35615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT GLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LEEFLANG, Paralegal, ROBBERT WHEILER, RICHARDSON, Warden and others
Kent Williams v. Leeflang, et al
as 22-35369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT GLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LEEFLANG, Paralegal, ROBBERT WHEILER, RICHARDSON, Warden and others
Kevin Bibbins v. Unknown Party, et al
as 17-15746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOSEPH BIBBINS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Legal Access Monitor at Tucson Complex, JULIA ERWIN, Supervisor of Legal Access Monitor at ADOC-ASPC-Tucson, AZ, BETTY ULIBARRI, Paralegal employee of Legal Access Monitor at ADOC-ASPC-Tucson, AZ and others
Richard Richards v. Pannan Day
as 17-15609
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD L. RICHARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
PANNAN DAYS, D.W. Arizona State Prison
Thomas Stewart, Jr. v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-15133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STEWART, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, UNKNOWN LOCKHART, named as Dr. Lockhart, KAREN BARCKLAY-DODSON, named as Dr. K. Barcklay-Dodson and others
Damon Campbell v. Colin Brown, et al
as 13-15709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON L. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN BROWN, CONRAD SCHAFF, ISIDRO BACA and others
Damon Campbell v. Colin Brown, et al
as 11-17464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON L. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN BROWN, CONRAD SCHAFF, ISIDRO BACA and others
Michael Clark v. D.W. Neven, et al
as 11-16702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
D.W. NEVEN and PHARRIS, Ms., Librarian
Russell Cohen v. Jerry Bainbridge, et al
as 09-15244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL DAVID COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY BAINBRIDGE, GREG COX, JACKIE CRAWFORD and others
James Nellums v. D.W. Neven
as 09-15205
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES NELLUMS
Respondent - Appellee:
D.W. NEVENS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
