Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Torres v. Neven
as 2:2011cv00518
Respondent:
D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Alberto Caro Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. D. W. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv00400
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Campbell
Defendant:
D. Cool, D. Fierro, Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deleon v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv01348
Petitioner:
Steven Deleon
Respondent:
Nevada Department Of Corrections, D.W. Neven and State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wentzell v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv01024
Respondent:
Attorney General and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Christopher Noel Wentzell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Neven
as 2:2010cv00944
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walkup v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00475
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LeBoeuf v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00448
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pugh v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00405
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, T. Gregory, Eric Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Neven et al
as 2:2009cv01155
Petitioner:
William Eldridge Caldwell
Respondent:
D.W. Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fitzgerald v. State Of Nevada
as 3:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Marty Scott Fitzgerald
Defendant:
State Of Nevada, Nevada Department Of Corrections, Nevada Board of Commissioners of the NDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
