Cases 1 - 10 of 40
WESTMORELAND v. STEBERGER
as 5:2026cv03708
Petitioner:
JER'BRELL KEON WESTMORELAND
Defendant:
DA - Lancaster County Notice Only Party to Accept Service and PA - Attorney General Notice Only Party to Accept Service
Respondent:
CHERYL STEBERGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Derrick Burnside v. Michael Wenerowicz, et al
as 11-4481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK H. BURNSIDE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, Superintendent Graterford SCI, ATTY GEN PA, DA PHILADELPHIA and others
Jose Perez v. Conner Blaine, et al
as 11-4230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE, Superintendent, ATTY GEN PA and DA LANCASTER
In re: Sergio Polanco
as 11-4036
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: SERGIO POLANCO
Defendant - Respondent:
DA LANCASTER
Romont Jones v. David Pitkins, et al
as 11-3935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROMONT ALVIN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PITKINS, DA LANCASTER and ATTY GEN PA
In re: Johnnie Young
as 11-3556
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNIE YOUNG
Defendant - Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA LANCASTER and ATTY GEN PA
In re: James Anderson
as 11-3150
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES ANDERSON, a/k/a James J. Hendel
Defendant - Respondent:
DONALD VAUGHN, GOVERNOR COMMONWEALTH OF PA, MARTIN HORN and others
Respondent - Respondent:
DA LANCASTER
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
GENE E K PRATTER
Darnell Doss v. Lancaster Cty Pol, et al
as 11-2981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL DOSS
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCASTER CTY POL, JOHN BURKHART, Sergeant/Detective, DA LANCASTER and others
James Pridgen v. Shannon, et al
as 11-2541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MARIO PRIDGEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANNON, DA LANCASTER and ATTY GEN PA
Samuel Perez v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 11-1682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL SANTIAGO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, Superintendent SCI Somerset, ATTY GEN PA and DA LANCASTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
