Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
NEMA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv01525
Plaintiff: YASSER J. NEMA
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Citizenship and Immigration Services , John F Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329
Jean Muvunyi v. Jefferson Sessions, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-60070
Petitioner: JEAN CLAUDE MUVUNYI
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gurmeet Singh v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60069
Petitioner: GURMEET SINGH
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ana Sanchez Plancarte, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60066
Petitioner: ANA MARIA SANCHEZ PLANCARTE, KEVIN ALEXIS CRUZ SANCHEZ, ELVIS ADOLFO CRUZ SANCHEZ and others
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ravinder Singh v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60067
Petitioner: RAVINDER SINGH
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Patricia Tejada-Jimenez v. Jefferson Sessions, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-60065
Petitioner: PATRICIA LORENA TEJADA-JIMENEZ
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fengdi Liu v. Jefferson Sessions, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-60064
Petitioner: FENGDI LIU
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chenglun Ma v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60058
Petitioner: CHENGLUN MA, also known as Pablo
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ayub Cabdalajamac v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60053
Petitioner: AYUB C. CABDALAJAMAC
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cristina Mazariegos, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60052
Petitioner: CRISTINA MARIBEL MAZARIEGOS and LUIS RONALDO MAZARIEGOS
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?