Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Elizabeth Lona v. Jefferson Session We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-70329
Petitioner: ELIZABETH LONA, AKA Lisa Elizabeth Lona, AKA Lisa Luna, AKA Chata Monkiker
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Satya Neupane v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70316
Petitioner: SATYA DEVI NEUPANE
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
County of Santa Clara v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff: County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Donald J. Trump, Dana J. Boente, Mark Sandy and others
Amicus Curiae: LifeMoves, City of Salinas, Administrative Law Professors and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Young Women's Christian Association of Silicon Valley
Intervenor Defendant: Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Maria Robles v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70326
Petitioner: MARIA ROBLES
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Jose Torres-Ayala v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70320
Petitioner: JOSE WILBUR TORRES-AYALA
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Beatriz Hernandez-Bustamante v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70325
Petitioner: BEATRIZ HERNANDEZ-BUSTAMANTE
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Chengyong Weng v. Jefferson Session We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-70324
Petitioner: CHENGYONG WENG
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Harpinder Chahal, et al v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70330
Petitioner: HARPINDER S. CHAHAL and GURMEET K. CHAHAL
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Cesar Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70322
Petitioner: CESAR IBAN RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Folajimi Akinshilo v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70317
Petitioner: FOLAJIMI IBIKINLE AKINSHILO, AKA Olujim Akiiusilo, AKA Jimi Kunle Akinshilo, AKA Olujimi Fola Akinshilo
Respondent: DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?