Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dangerfield v. Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Tim Dangerfield
Defendant:
Duck Creek Technologies, Inc., Bill Bloom, Kathy Crusco and others
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10412
Plaintiff:
Kevin Abbott, Leslie Adams, Ricky Adamson and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dangerfield v. Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08555
Plaintiff:
Suzie Dangerfield
Defendant:
Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Mohamed v. Republic Records, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08469
Defendant:
XO Records, LLC, Thomas Bangalter, Jason Quenneville and others
Plaintiff:
Yasmin Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Omega Consulting, as Assignee of Eastman Machine Company v. Rob Roy Inc
as 1:2009cv00541
Plaintiff:
Omega Consulting, as Assignee of Eastman Machine Company
Defendant:
Rob Roy Inc
Noticing Party:
Eric Dangerfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Omega Consulting et al v. Rob Roy Inc
as 1:2009cv02627
Plaintiff:
Omega Consulting and Eric Dangerfield
Defendant:
Rob Roy Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dangerfield v. Bevacqua et al
as 1:2007cv07810
Plaintiff:
Joan Child Dangerfield
Defendant:
Anthony Bevacqua and Rodney Dangerfield, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
