Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Saphyre Redford, et al v. Sybil Rappaport Trust, et al.
as 15-14888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAPHYRE REDFORD, a.k.a. Crystal Biton, a.k.a. Marcelle Biton and DANIEL BITTON, a.k.a. Danielle Bitton
Defendant - Appellee:
SYBIL RAPPAPORT TRUST, ET AL.
Daniel Bitton v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 15-13493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, BARACK OBAMA, U.S. CONGRESS and others
Daniel Bitton v. Burger King, et al
as 15-13305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BURGER KING, STARBUCKS CORPORATION, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Daniel Bitton, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 15-13285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BITTON and CRYSTAL BITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. CONGRESS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Bitton et al v. President of the United States of America et al
as 9:2015cv80887
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bitton and Crystal Bitton
Defendant:
President of the United States of America, United States Congress, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bitton v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2015cv22318
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bitton
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Barrack Obama, U.S. Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bitton v. Burger King et al
as 9:2015cv80861
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bitton
Defendant:
Burger King, Starbucks, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danielle Biton v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 14-12979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIELLE BITON
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KATHLEEN ALEXANDER, DANIELLE BITTON and others
Biton v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 0:2010cv61038
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Kathleen Alexander, Danielle Bitton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
