Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Rodney J. Quigley v. First Defense International Group Inc et al
as 8:2015cv00617
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Peter Steyn, Daps Inc doing business as DPS ABC Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney J Quigley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MORTIMER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-04169
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. MORTIMER and CHERYL MORTIMER
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, AMTICO and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS CO. , NAPA , QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, AMTICO and others
KILGORE et al v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-04029
Plaintiff:
VICTOR B. KILGORE and JEAN KILGORE
Defendant:
ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, ALLEN SHERMAN-HOFF, Alliance Laundry Systems, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
BEAZER EAST , UNIVERSAL REFRACTORIES and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Cross_defendant:
BEAZER EAST , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, Alliance Laundry Systems, LLC and others
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
