Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Dukes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Darnell Dukes
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Dukes v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr.
as 15-4157
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Darnell Dukes v. C. Garcia
as 14-15573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Defendant - Appellee:
C. GARCIA
Darnell Dukes v. Tim Stricklin, et al
as 13-55025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM STRICKLIN, Correctional Sergeant, MICHELLE BLAKEE, Correctional Officer and DARIN CLEGG, Correctional Officer
USA v. Darnell Duke
as 12-4065
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Darnell Dukes v. Brenda Cash, et al
as 12-56631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDA M. CASH, Warden, individual and official capacity, P. FINANDER, Chief Medical Officer, individual and official capacity, J. FITTER, Medical Doctor, individual and official capacity and others
Darnell Dukes v. B. Cash, et al
as 12-56618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Defendant - Appellee:
B. M. CASH, individual and official capacity, D. J. WILLIAMS, individual and official capacity, K. THOMAS, Captain, individual and official capacity and others
Dukes v. Foston et al
as 3:2012cv02180
Plaintiff:
Darnell Dukes
Defendant:
D. Foston, W. J. Sullivan, W. Beauchemin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Zamora et al
as 1:2012cv01014
Plaintiff:
Darnell Dukes
Defendant:
L.D. Zamora, M. Hutchinson, S. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Harrington et al
as 1:2012cv00941
Plaintiff:
Darnell Dukes
Defendant:
K. Harrington, C. Garcia and E. Borrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
