Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Bennie Dixon v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 10-55959
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENNIE DIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., The Attorney General of the State of California
Edward Portillo v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 10-55925
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD PORTILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden and SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of Adult California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Robert Winters v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 10-15667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANTHONY WINTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of CDCR, DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden, L. WATSON and others
Mario Silva v. Darrell Adam
as 10-55432
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO SILVA
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden
Robert Winters v. USDCFR
as 10-70823
:
In re: ROBERT ANTHONY WINTERS
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANTHONY WINTERS
Respondent:
USDC, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of CDCR, DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden, L. WATSON and others
Manuel Cisneros v. Darrell Adam
as 10-55186
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANUEL CORONA CISNEROS
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden
Patrick Pierce v. Darrell Adam
as 10-15214
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK ANDREW PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden
Curley Broussard, Jr. v. Derral Adams, et al
as 10-55134
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden and JOHN DONEY, Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Bernie Briggs v. Darrel Adam
as 09-57058
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNIE F. BRIGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden
George Hamilton v. R. Hernandez, et al
as 09-17881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
R. J. HERNANDEZ, J. TYNES, Assistant Warden, ANTHONY LAMARQUE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
