Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Darren Heyman v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-16377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN HEYMAN, Esquire and DARREN HEYMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel; on behalf of Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education; on behalf of University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NEAL SMATRESK, DONALD SNYDER and others
Darren Heyman v. USDC-NVL
as 20-70896
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DARREN HEYMAN, Esquire, STOWE SHOEMAKER, SARAH TANFORD and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Petitioner:
DARREN HEYMAN, Esquire
Darren Heyman v. State of Nevada, et al
as 19-15523
Defendant / Appellee:
NEAL SMATRESK, PHILIP BURNS, KRISTIN MALEK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN HEYMAN
Darren Heyman v. State of Nevada, et al
as 18-15438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN HEYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel; on behalf of Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education; on behalf of University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NEAL SMATRESK, DONALD SNYDER and others
Darren Heyman v. State of Nevada, et al
as 17-17495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN HEYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel on behalf of Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education on behalf of University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NEAL SMATRESK, DONALD SNYDER and others
Darren Heyman v. State Bar of Nevada, et al
as 17-17343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN HEYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF NEVADA, ex rel on behalf of Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education on behalf of University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NEAL SMATRESK, DONALD SNYDER and others
Heyman v. State of Nevada ex rel Board of Regents for the Nevada System of Higher Education et al
as 2:2015cv01228
Defendant:
Philip Burns, Curtis Love, Kristin Malek and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Heyman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
