Cases 11 - 20 of 6,250
GUITSON et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59263
Plaintiff:
FRANK E. GUITSON , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VALENTIN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56834
Plaintiff:
PEDRO VALENTIN , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOMEZ et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59227
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JOHNSON et al v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv57553
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LARSEN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59238
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WILLIAMS et al v. A. L. BURBANK & COMPANY LTD.
as 2:2011cv57879
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRUBERT et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58666
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WALTERS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59461
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. WALTERS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BAH et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55452
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. PEEBLES and WILLARD E. BARTEL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ABNER et al v. BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORP.
as 2:2011cv58019
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE ABNER , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
