Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dunigan v. Wright, et al.
as 26-2224
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant:
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE, MICHAEL BOXMAN, PROCTOR HUG and others
Dunigan v. Wright, et al.
as 25-7006
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant:
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE, MICHAEL BOXMAN, PROCTOR HUG and others
(PC) Bonilla v. Sweet et al
as 2:2025cv00659
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Michael W. Sweet, Michael G. Bowman, David De Alba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Sweet et al
as 2:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Michael W. Sweet, Michael G. Bowman, David De Alba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas John Smithson v. David De Alba et al
as 8:2020cv01777
Defendant:
Pacific Investment Management Company, Nav Gill, Atlantic Financial and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Smithson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas John Smithson v. David De Alba et al
as 2:2020cv08520
Defendant:
Pacific Investment Management Company, Nav Gill, Atlantic Financial and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Smithson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Langston v. White et al
as 2:2019cv01168
Plaintiff:
Walter Langston
Defendant:
Delbert Ors, Steve White and David De Alba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bonilla v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2018cv02724
Defendant:
Michael G. Bowman, Kern County, Michaele E. Dellastrillo and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla and Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Sweet et al
as 3:2018cv05734
Defendant:
David De Alba, Michael W Sweet and Michael G. Bowman
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bonilla v. Sweet et al
as 2:2018cv02364
Defendant:
Michael G. Bowman, Michael W. Sweet and David De Alba
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
