Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
ALVAREZ et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
JOSUE ALVAREZ, RODOLFO ALVAREZ, MICHAEL T. ARASHIRO and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Murphy v. Wilkie
as 19-2064
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Not Yet Classified:
DAVID G. MURPHY
IN RE BYERLY
as 08-1408
Appellant:
Chuan-Ling Tsai, David G. Iwanski, Jian Qin and others
Appellee:
John J. Doll, Acting Director, Patent and Trademark Office
John J. Doll, Acting Director, Patent And Trademark Office:
CHRISTIAN V US
as 02-5165
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ALAN R. CHANDLER, ALVIN S. CHANDLER, CHARLES D. COAKER and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
ALBERT T. BECK, ALVIN R. APPLING, ANDREW M. BRANTLEY and others
Plaintiff:
CHARDS D. CHANCELLOR, III
Amicus Curiae:
MICHAEL CHRISTENSEN, ET AL and RONALD ALVIN, ET AL
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES
HAIMBACH V OPM
as 02-3051
Petitioner:
DAVID G. HAIMBACH, DAVID G. HAIMBACH, DAVID G. HAIMBACH and others
Respondent:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.