Cases filed in District of Columbia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03156
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BOLD ALLIANCE et al v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01822
Plaintiff: BOLD ALLIANCE , BOLD EDUCATION FUND , FRIENDS OF NELSON COUNTY and others
Defendant: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, NEIL CHATTERJEE, CHERYL A. LAFLEUR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GILBERT et al v. JAMES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01364
Plaintiff: HAROLD B. GILBERT , PAUL C. HOOPER , WILLIAM S. DORMAN and others
Defendant: DEBORAH LEE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GARMON v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00828
Plaintiff: DAVID G. GARMON
Defendant: ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, SOUTHEAST REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY, JOSEPH NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POTTER v. LARIMER
as 1:2010cv02227
Plaintiff: ANTONIO T. POTTER
Defendant: DAVID G. LARIMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. KLAASSEN et al
as 1:2007cv00286
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANDERSON, ROBERT ANDERSON and ROBERT ANDERSON
Defendant: PAUL J. KLAASSEN, TERESA MERRITT KLAASSEN, THOMAS B. NEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOLNER v. KLAASSEN et al
as 1:2007cv00227
Plaintiff: CATHERINE MOLNER
Defendant: PAUL J. KLAASSEN, DAVID W. FAEDER, TIMOTHY S. SMICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROCKINGTON CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. KLAASSEN et al
as 1:2007cv00143
Defendant: PAUL J. KLAASSEN, J. DOUGLAS HOLLADAY, THOMAS J. DONOHUE and others
Plaintiff: BROXTON CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, CATHERINE MOLNER and ROBERT ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?