Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Derrick
as 1:2020cv00128
Defendant:
David G. Derrick
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Schwartz Group v. Derrick et al
as 2:2018cv00729
Defendant:
David G. Derrick and James Dalton
Plaintiff:
Schwartz Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlile v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance et al
as 2:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
David G. Carlile
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance and Reliance Standard Life Insurance Policy Number LTD 123420
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Deem et al v. Baron et al
as 2:2015cv00755
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Deem , David G. Law , DJ Property Solutions and others
Defendant:
Tracey Baron, Michelle Baron, Turning Leaf Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nolasco v. Daynes et al
as 2:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Nolasco
Defendant:
Richard W. Daynes, David G. Christensen and Benjamin C. McMurray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick et al v. Leybovich
as 1:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
David G. Derrick and James Dalton
Defendant:
Lazar Leybovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderer v. Inaura et al
as 2:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Anderer
Defendant:
Inaura, Peter Bookman, Rodney A. Rasmussen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Aquapower et al v. Yurth et al
as 2:2010cv00568
Plaintiff:
Aquapower and Aquaenergy
Defendant:
David G. Yurth, Crit Randall Killen, Edward G. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mowen et al
as 2:2009cv00786
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jeffrey L. Mowen, Thomas R. Fry, Bevan J. Wilde and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
