Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Cordis Corporation v. Lee, et al
as 1:2012cv00075
Interested Party:
Abbott Laboratories
Defendant:
Michelle Lee, United States Patent and Trademark Office and David J. Kappos
Plaintiff:
Cordis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Theranos, Inc. v. Lee
as 1:2012cv01445
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee and David J. Kappos
Plaintiff:
Theranos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
Life Technologies Corporation et al v. Rea
as 1:2012cv01518
Plaintiff:
Life Technologies Corporation, Geneart AG and Applied Biosystems, LLC
Defendant:
Hon. David J. Kappos and Teresa Stanek Rea
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
BTG International Ltd. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
BTG International Ltd.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
UCB Pharma, S.A. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
UCB Pharma, S.A.
Defendant:
Hon. David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Firmenich SA v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Firmenich SA
Defendant:
Hon. David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Emotional Brain B.V. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Emotional Brain B.V.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Echo Therapeutics, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Echo Therapeutics, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Firmenich SA v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Firmenich SA
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Hypermed Imaging, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Hypermed Imaging, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
