Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jacoby v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2022cv02709
Plaintiff:
David Jacoby
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Glen Reder, et al v. Audi Aktiengesellschaft, et al
as 20-17278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARLA REINHARDT, ISAAC HU, DAVID JACOBY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PORSCHE CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., DAIMLER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, (Daimler AG), BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GERMAN AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Yang v. Fonfa et al
as 2:2020cv01518
Defendant:
Weidner Management, LLC, Las Vegas Economic Impact Regional Center, LLC, Sahara Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kaiqing Yang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wu et al v. Fonfa et al
as 2:2019cv00229
Plaintiff:
YIRANG LIU, MING LIU, KAIQING YANG and others
Defendant:
Weidner Management, LLC, Las Vegas Economic Impact Regional Center, LLC, Eastern Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, et al. v. 1994 Alicia P. Guggenheim
as 1:2011cv03750
Plaintiff:
Law Debenture Trust Company of New York , Wilmington Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Defendant:
1994 Alicia P. Guggenheim , Friedman & Huey , Alpha Master Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vacca et al v. Country Ford LTD. et al
as 2:2010cv04128
Defendant:
Vincent Caruso, Country Ford LTD., David Jacoby and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Conaway, Roy Kohn, David Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Eric Wolfgang, et al v. Carl Swithers, et al
as 08-3572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOHN WOLFGANG
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
STEVE MCCOLLOUGH, CHRISTOPHER GROB, TIMOTHY HUNSINGER and others
Defendant:
CARL SWITHERS, LINDA MORRISON, C.I. President, SUSAN KUZMINSKI, C.I. Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
