Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Vreeland v. Zupan, et al
as 23-1301
Petitioner / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID ZUPAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
In re: Vreeland, II
as 22-1401
Petitioner:
In re: DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent:
DAVID ZUPAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Vreeland v. Weiser, et al
as 20-1385
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK J. MULLIGAN, Attorney at Law, DAVID ZUPAN, Colorado Department of Corrections Warden, RYAN CRANE, Assistant Colorado Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Vreeland, II v. Weiser et al
as 1:2020cv02298
Defendant:
R. Scott Reisch, Lynn C. Hartfield, Patrick J. Mulligan and others
Plaintiff:
Delmart E.J.M. Vreeland, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
In re: Vreeland, et al
as 20-1200
Petitioner:
In re: DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DAVID ZUPAN
DeAtley, et al v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 19-1372
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA ORTIZ, Investigator, MICHAEL MILLER, DAVID ZUPAN and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS J. AURELIO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN DEATLEY
Aurelio, et al v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 19-1362
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA ORTIZ, Investigator, MICHAEL MILLER, DAVID ZUPAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. AURELIO
Plaintiff:
ALAN DEATLEY
Vreeland v. Zupan, et al
as 19-1244
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DAVID ZUPAN
Petitioner / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Vreeland v. Zupan, et al
as 16-1503
Petitioner - Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID ZUPAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Owens v. Zupan, et al
as 16-1317
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY OWENS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID ZUPAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
