Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Pit Viper, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv05838
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Shangmiao International Trade Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Rongcan Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Pit Viper, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04498
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Guangzhou Daxin Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd., Henan Huaying Shoes Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Talisman Designs LLC v. Dasani, et al
as 20-3104
Defendant / Appellee:
ODHE15, CASAND 85, FAT MANGO and others
Defendant:
ZHENGPIN, MAOHUASHANGCHENG, FHSOW and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TALISMAN DESIGNS LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
AA FASHION
Not Yet Classified:
SANMUBO TRADE, URNANAL, LIGHTSHH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011mc00168
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Type:
Other Statutes
Daxin Petroleum PTE LTD v. OOO "Severniy Briz"
as 1:2009cv07390
Plaintiff:
Daxin Petroleum PTE LTD and Daxin Petroleum PTE LTD
Defendant:
OOO "Severniy Briz"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Daxin Petroleum PTE LTD v. Nipporos Corporation
as 1:2009cv02331
Plaintiff:
Daxin Petroleum PTE LTD and Daxin Petroleum PTE LTD
Defendant:
Nipporos Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kokkinaki Shipping Limited v. Daxin Petroleum PTE LTD
as 1:2008cv06200
Plaintiff:
Kokkinaki Shipping Limited and Kokkinaki Shipping Limited
Defendant:
Daxin Petroleum PTE LTD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
