Cases 21 - 30 of 423
STEPHEN YANG v. 420 DC LLC
as 1:2023cv03137
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN YANG
Defendant:
420 DC LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WHITNEY v. DC SOCCER, LLC
as 1:2023cv02988
Plaintiff:
READE WHITNEY
Defendant:
DC SOCCER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02399
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT / OFFICER SMITH BADGE # 4858 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
REYNA v. CBS NEWS et al
as 1:2023cv02169
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. REYNA, SR.
Defendant:
CBS NEWS, NEW YORK, WASHINGTON, DC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILL v. VIOREL et al
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
STEVEN VIOREL, AUSTIN GILL, BLOCK BY BLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILL v. NBC NEWS et al
as 1:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
NBC NEWS, JENNIFER BUSH, STEVEN VIOREL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BURNS v. STERLING STFH et al
as 1:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DENNIS BURNS, SR.
Defendant:
STERLING STFH, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS FAMILY CENTER, ROSLYNN WHITMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
