Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Lewis Rhinehart, et al v. Debra Scutt, et al
as 17-2166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS RHINEHART, Personal Representative for the Estate of Kenneth A. Rhinehart and DAVID L. RHINEHART, Personal Representative for the Estate of Kenneth A. Rhinehart
Defendant:
DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden
Defendant - Appellee:
VERNON STEVENSON and ADAM EDELMAN
Darricell Henry v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 16-2277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRICELL HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden, NEIL THOMPSON and others
Jerome Sweezer v. Debra Scutt, et al
as 15-2290
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME SWEEZER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden, RICHARD MCGILL, Corrections Transportation Officer RGC, GLENN KING, Corrections Officer and others
Chester Hardy v. Lance Barbre, et al
as 15-2135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCE BARBRE, RAYMOND WOODROW, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Thomas Wallace v. Debra Scutt
as 15-1923
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS JAMES WALLACE
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden, Warden
Chester Hardy v. Debra Scutt, et al
as 15-1820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden, JOYCE P. POTTER, LPN, EDELMAN, Dr. and others
Jami Naturalite v. Gregory Forner, et al
as 15-1502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMI NATURALITE
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY FORNER, Corrections Officer, ROBIN GILBERT, Arus/Spec.Trans Coord., LARRY FORD, Asst. Deputy Warden and others
Charles Mayfield v. Richard Miles, et al
as 15-1278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MAYFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MILES, Dr., DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden, Warden, KEFF, Physician's Assistant and others
Dickie Colwell v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 15-1002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DICKIE COLWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., ADAM EDELMAN, Consultant, MEGAN J. DZIEDZIC, Dietician and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
