Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Banana v. Brookhart
as 3:2024cv01109
Petitioner:
Donald Banana
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dalcollo v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Justin Dalcollo
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Warden Brown, Alisha Curtwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Wexford Health Source, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2023cv16708
Petitioner:
Deshanta Young
Respondent:
Dee-Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dees v. IDOC
as 3:2023cv03359
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Dees
Defendant:
IDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renner v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
as 3:2023pq03024
Plaintiff:
Dee Renner
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC, SYNGENTA AG, CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dees v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02693
Plaintiff:
Alan Dees
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ealy v. Brockhart et al
as 3:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ealy
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brockhart and Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealy v. Brockhart et al
as 2:2023cv02072
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ealy
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brockhart and . Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealy v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ealy
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Brown, Rob Jefferies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
