Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ford v. Ciraolo-Klepper et al
as 1:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Melba Ford
Defendant:
Caroline Ciraolo-Klepper, Dennis Stiffler, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Office of Procedure and Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv07365
Petitioner:
JAMES V. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014mc00137
Petitioner:
JAMES V. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
Jack Clark v. USA, et al
as 10-16355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER, in his official capacity
Clark v. United States, et al.
as 1:2010cv00426
Plaintiff:
Jack Clark
Defendant:
United States , Internal Revenue Service and Dennis Stiffler
United States of America et al v. Jack Clark
as 1:2009cv01125
Petitioner:
United States of America and Dennis Stiffler
Respondent:
Jack Clark
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America et al v. CLARK
as 1:2009at00506
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Dennis Stiffler
Defendant:
JACK CLARK
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Stiffler v. Smith
as 1:2009at00244
Defendant:
Thomas Smith
Plaintiff:
Dennis Stiffler
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Smith
as 1:2009cv00584
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Dennis Stiffler
Defendant:
Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
CLARK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv02047
Plaintiff:
JACK CLARK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
