Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Huth v. Parham et al
as 2:2021cv00966
Defendant:
Nellis Air Force Base, Department of the Air Force, Mary Allyson Parham and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lynn Huth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kotab v. U.S. Department of the Air Force et al
as 2:2018cv02031
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense, Anthony M Kurta, U.S. Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas X Kotab
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Darlynn v. Department of the Air Force et al
as 2:2017cv02800
Plaintiff:
Juanitta Darlynn
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force and Christopher Mark Sherman
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Rodriguez v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2015cv02507
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force, United States of America and United States of America ex rel
Plaintiff:
Federico Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
City Of North Las Vegas v. Clark County Nevada et al
as 2:2011cv00944
Counter Defendant:
City Of North Las Vegas
Plaintiff:
City Of North Las Vegas
Counter Claimant:
Clark County Nevada
Defendant:
Clark County Nevada, Michael B. Donley, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
