Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
T&T and Associates v. State Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2012cv00412
Plaintiff:
T&T and Associates
Defendant:
State Department of Transportation and WPX Energy Rocky Mountain, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Aragon v. Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority
as 1:2010cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jolene Aragon
Defendant:
City of Colorado Springs, Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority, Colorado Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wightman et al v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv02437
Plaintiff:
Jean (I) Mason Wightman and Jean Mason Wightman
Defendant:
USA, Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Balderas v. Colorado Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2008cv00453
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda Balderas
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Transportation and Brandie L. Peterson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Marr et al v. Hughes et al
as 1:2007cv01746
Plaintiff:
Elaine Spencer Marr and Elliott Paul Moore
Defendant:
Larry H. Hughes, Tommie R. Hughes and Colorado Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States Department of Transportation et al v. Bonora
as 1:2007cv01375
Petitioner:
United States Department of Transportation and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Respondent:
Mike Bonora
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 0502 Transportation Administrative Subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
