Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
McSmith v. Georgia Thrift Stores, Inc.
as 1:2021mi00110
Plaintiff:
Derek LeRoy McSmith
Defendant:
Georgia Thrift Stores, Inc. doing business as Value Village
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
McSmith v. Georgia Thrift Stores, Inc.
as 1:2021mi00099
Plaintiff:
Derek LeRoy McSmith
Defendant:
Georgia Thrift Stores, Inc. doing business as Value Village
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Derek McSmith v. Unite Here Local 23
as 21-10078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK LEROY MCSMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITE HERE LOCAL 23
McSmith v. Georgia Department of Labor et al
as 1:2020mi00057
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Labor and Comerica Bank
Plaintiff:
Derek LeRoy McSmith
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
McSmith v. DAL Global Services, LLC et al
as 1:2020mi00054
Defendant:
DAL Global Services, LLC and AirCo Aviation Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Derek LeRoy McSmith
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
McSmith v. DHS. Division of Family and Children Services
as 1:2019mi00154
Plaintiff:
Derek Leroy McSmith
Defendant:
DHS. Division of Family and Children Services
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
MCSMITH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2019cv01760
Plaintiff:
DEREK LEROY MCSMITH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Derek McSmith v. Clayton County, GA., et al
as 19-12052
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAYTON COUNTY, GA., VICTOR HILL, Individually & in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Clayton County, Ga., and CLAYTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK LEROY MCSMITH
McSmith v. Unite Here Local 23
as 1:2018cv04233
Defendant:
Unite Here Local 23
Plaintiff:
Derek LeRoy McSmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
