Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Zajdel et al v. Exel Inc., a Foreign Corp. d/b/a DHL Supply Chain (USA) et al
as 2:2021cv12026
Plaintiff:
Malory Zajdel and Adam Zajdel
Defendant:
Exel Inc., a Foreign Corp. d/b/a DHL Supply Chain (USA) and Matthew Paul Bohland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. MemberSelect Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv11078
Defendant:
MemberSelect Insurance Company, Anthem BlueCross and BlueShield, Exel Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lynn Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Pierson et al v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc et al
as 5:2012cv10176
Plaintiff:
Randall Pierson , Nancy Londskroener , Lonzie Raymond and others
Defendant:
Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc, DHL Holdings USA, Inc., National Union Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv11718
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Banerjea v. DHL Express (USA), Incorporated
as 2:2009cv11112
Plaintiff:
Tara Banerjea
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Taylor Land Group v. DHL Specialized Services (USA) Incorporated et al
as 2:2009cv10252
Plaintiff:
Taylor Land Group
Defendant:
DHL Specialized Services (USA) Incorporated, BP Products North America, Incorporated, BP Products North America, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv14685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Miller v. Airborne Express, Incorporated et al
as 2:2007cv11035
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Miller
Defendant:
Airborne Express, Incorporated and DHL Worldwide Express, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
