Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 132
Ronald Riley v. District Attorney Dauphin
as 15-3005
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD RILEY
Defendant / Appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Robert Hosby v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 15-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT HOSBY
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
In re: Eric Jone We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2482
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: ERIC KENNETH JONES
Defendant - Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Nominal Respondent: YVETTE KANE
In re: Charlie Clemmon
as 15-1902
Petitioner: In re: CHARLIE CLEMMONS
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Shonari Warren v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 15-1797
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHONARI WARREN
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Norman Cadmu
as 15-1530
Petitioner: In re: NORMAN CADMUS
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Cleveland Butler v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 15-1179
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLEVELAND BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
In re: David McGinley
as 15-1029
Petitioner: In re: DAVID R. MCGINLEY
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
LaVince Pate v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 14-4615
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAVINCE PATE
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Vegas Gibson v. Jerome Walsh, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-4590
Plaintiff - Appellant: VEGAS GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?