Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Samuel Lowry v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 24-1509
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEE LOWRY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Keith Burley, Jr. v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 22-2719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMONT BURLEY, JR.
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD and others
Gaylord Spell v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 19-3031
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAYLORD SPELL
In re: Randall Chumley v. District Attorney Lawrence Cou
as 17-1132
Petitioner:
In re: RANDALL HOYT CHUMLEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Willie Smith v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 16-3086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
In re: James Larry Andrew
as 15-3950
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES LARRY ANDREWS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
In re: Randall Chumley
as 15-2791
Petitioner:
In re: RANDALL HOYT CHUMLEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
In re: Dana Wiley
as 13-4029
Petitioner:
In re: DANA W. WILEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Lynn Van Tassel v. John Hodge, et al
as 13-3256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN A. VAN TASSEL
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE JOHN W. HODGE, Judge, Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, in his official and individual capacities, HONORABLE THOMAS M. PICCIONE, Judge Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, in his official and individual capacities, LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTIONS and others
In re: Jason Scott
as 13-2930
Petitioner:
In re: JASON L. SCOTT
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
