Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES et al v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
INTEK AUTO LEASING, INC. v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ et al
as 2:2018cv09651
Defendant:
MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, EZ PASS GROUP, NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff:
INTEK AUTO LEASING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv01039
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Illinois , Elisa Dickson and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , Sanofi US Service Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MEDCO HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00522
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA , THE STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant:
MEDCO HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. , ACCREDO HEALTH GROUP, INC. and HEMOPHILIA HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. OMNICARE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01326
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF GEORGIA, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant:
PHARMERICA CORPORATION, NCS HEALTHCARE, INC., NEIGHBORCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. JAMES JUDD, M.D. V. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED
as 2:2010cv04914
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. JAMES JUDD, M.D. , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
JENSEN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC et al
as 1:2007cv02339
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. JENSEN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICA) INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
