Cases 41 - 50 of 2,717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
DABNEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
JOHN DABNEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and D.C. OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JERICA HARRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03611
Plaintiff:
JERICA HARRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00329
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
ARLIE SESSION and NO PARTY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
SESSION v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
ARLIE SESSION
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
G.L. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
G. L., Gary Le, Vanessa Le and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00237
Not Yet Classified:
TRAMAINE NEWSOME and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
QTAISH v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03702
Plaintiff:
INEZ QTAISH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
