Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ruiz v. Riker Island et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ruiz
Defendant:
Riker Island, Downstate, Midstate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engles v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles and Jesse Engles
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fisher, Diane Van Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. State of New York DOC and Comm Supervision et al
as 9:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Casanova Holmes
Defendant:
State of New York DOC and Comm Supervision, John Doe and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredericks v. State of New York DOC/Albany
as 9:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks and Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
State of New York DOC/Albany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jhagroo v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jhagroo
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS and NYS DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. NYS DOCS
as 9:2017cv00428
Petitioner:
Aaron Martinez
Respondent:
NYS DOCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. DOCS et al
as 9:2014cv01505
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gray
Defendant:
DOCS, County Jails, David E. Harder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presley v. Pataki et al
as 9:2014cv00696
Plaintiff:
Don Elvis Sugar Presley
Defendant:
Governor Pataki, Harold Graham, Mary E. Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. DOCS
as 9:2014cv00628
Plaintiff:
Kaylin Williams
Defendant:
DOCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. DOCS Commissioner et al
as 9:2012cv01817
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson
Defendant:
DOCS Commissioner, DOCS Deputy Commissioner, New York State Office of Mental Health Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
