Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PERRONG v. REWEB REAL ESTATE LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04228
Defendant:
REWEB REAL ESTATE LLC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, KYLE MCLAUGHLIN and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
PERRONG v. OX CAR CARE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03224
Defendant:
MIKE MARDARESCO, GIAVONNA HUNT, MIRCEA MARDARESCO and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PERRONG v. CARGUARDIAN WARRANTY, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02770
Defendant:
RYAN CHRISTOPHER EARL, CARGUARDIAN WARRANTY, LLC and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
PERRONG v. MS INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES "MSIE" et al
as 2:2018cv04760
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
KASHAN CHARLES RILEY, MS INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES "MSIE", JANE DARLENE RILEY and others
PERRONG v. SECURE AUTOMOTIVE SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02864
Defendant:
SECURE AUTOMOTIVE SOLUTIONS INC., BENJAMIN MARK GRIFFIN, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PERRONG v. ADVANCED BROKERAGE CONCEPTS LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02624
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION, ARX HOLDING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
PERRONG v. MCAVENEY et al
as 2:2018cv02524
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
CHARLES C. MCAVENEY , CECILIA MCAVENEY , DOE CORPORATION 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
PERRONG v. CAPITAL COMEBACK, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv10017
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
CAPITAL COMEBACK, LLC , MICHAEL PARKER , DOES 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
