Cases 31 - 40 of 57
BROOKS et al v. BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BROOKS , JOYCE BROOKS , DANNY BROOKS and others
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, BANK MELLI IRAN, MELLI BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
FROST et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00603
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and MUQTADA AL-SADR
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL FROST , TAMMIE FROST , AMANDA DOSS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
FELDER v. LEGGETT et al
as 1:2016cv01865
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MARKELL FELDER
Defendant:
ISIAL LEGGETT, M. JONES, TIMOTHY BETTIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
POBLETE v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2016cv01798
Plaintiff:
LUIS IVAN POBLETE
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE , BERYL A. HOWELL , AARON DREW NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01671
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDULLAH v. DREW et al
as 1:2014cv01078
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA ABDULLAH
Defendant:
DREW, HAWKINS, DUNCAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRYHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012mc00533
Plaintiff:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, 10th CIRCUIT JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
DREW v. USA
as 1:2012cv01484
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANDRE DREW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2012cv01016
Plaintiff:
JAMARR RASHAUN JOHNSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. HARRIS, K. CIMOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RISENHOOVER v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2011cv01937
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, ERIC HOLDER, JR., DREW DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
