Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Sean Rogers v. Duncan MacLaren, et al
as 20-1720
Defendant / Appellee:
HEARING INVESTIGATOR VANSLOTEN, Kinross Correctional Facility, DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden Kinross Correctional Facility, D. MASTEW, Deputy Warden/Administrative Assistant Kinross Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN ADAM ROGERS
Stanley Parker v. Colleen Myotte, et al
as 20-1144
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MASTAW, Administrative Assistant to the Warden, KIRK MAHER, Mail Room Sorting Location, RICHARD RUSSELL, MDOC Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY PARKER
David Hardy v. Unknown Agee, et al
as 19-1204
Defendant / Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden, DAVID MASTAW, Administrative Assistant, UNKNOWN AGEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID HARDY
Paul Torres v. Duncan MacLaren
as 19-1132
Respondent / Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL TORRES
Quentin Betty v. Kenneth McKee, et al
as 19-1117
Defendant / Appellee:
C. ANDERSON, Grievance Coordinator, M. CALLENTINE, Food Service Director, KENNETH T. MCKEE, Warden, Deputy Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUENTIN D. BETTY
Shondre Tucker v. Duncan MacLaren
as 17-1873
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHONDRE TYREESE TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden
In re: Lenard Bradford-Bey
as 17-1517
Movant:
In re: LENARD BRADFORD-BEY
Respondent:
DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden
Andrew Miller v. Duncan MacLaren
as 17-1061
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden
Leo Ambler v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 16-2595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEO MICHAEL AMBLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director Michigan Department of Corrections, CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden, Warden, GREGORY SKIPPER, Deputy Warden and others
Marcus Martin v. Duncan MacLaren, et al
as 16-2363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden, JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, Former Warden and KATHY OLSON, Deputy Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
