Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. RMG Donuts, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv12395
Defendant:
Michele J Lawlor, Ralph F D'Alelio, Jr., RMG Donuts, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC and DD IP Holder LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Driftway Donuts LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11830
Defendant:
Driftway Donuts LLC, Marie G Reis, Ivo Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC and DD IP Holder LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Coelho Family Donuts, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv12273
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC , Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Coelho Family Donuts, Inc. , Family Donuts, Inc. , Billerica Donuts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Kenmore Square Foods LLC et al
as 1:2010cv12130
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC , Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC and DD IP Holder LLC
Defendant:
Kenmore Square Foods LLC, Highland Avenue Restaurant Corp., Danzach Foods Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Symphony Donuts, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv10098
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Defendant:
Symphony Donuts, Inc., Berkley Enterprises, Inc., Panagiotis Vorvis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Dunkin Donuts Franchised Resturants LLC et al v. Agawam Donuts Inc et al
as 1:2007cv11444
Plaintiff:
Dunkin Donuts Franchised Resturants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Agawam Donuts, Inc., B.E. Donuts, Inc., Belmont Donuts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.