Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Dan Goodrick v. USDC-IDB
as 22-70214
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAN GOODRICK, JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC, DAVID TOMILSON and others
Petitioner:
DAN GOODRICK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Goodrick v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Bree Derrick, Ross Castleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Correction, et al
as 20-36004
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILLIP PETERSEN, Dr., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, CLAYTON BUNT, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAN GOODRICK
Defendant / Appellant:
RORY YORK
Dan Goodrick v. Ashley Dowell, et al
as 19-35310
Defendant:
IDAHO BOARD OF CORRECTIONS and IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHLEY DOWELL, TIM MCKAY, JEFF ZMUDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAN GOODRICK
Goodrick v. Field et al
as 1:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Al Ramirez, Campbell, Cindy Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Idaho Board of Correction, Debbie Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrick v. Zmuda et al
as 1:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Keith Yordy, Garrett Coburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Board of Correction, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Goodrick v. Terema Carlin, et al
as 13-35923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN GOODRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
TEREMA CARLIN, GALE MUNDEN, AMY ANDERSON and others
Dan Goodrick v. Blades, et al
as 12-35802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN GOODRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
BLADES, Warden, D. W. CROSBY, SCHLIENZ, Lt. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
