Cases 1 - 10 of 1,052
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CAMIRE et al v. ALCOA USA CORP. et al
as 1:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
MARTHA BRENNAN CAMIRE, CRAIG JEFFERSON, DAVID LYN SHEPHERD and others
Defendant:
ALCOA USA CORP., ALCOA CORP., ALCOA BENEFITS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
LEMIEUX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHITE HOUSE
as 1:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DANIEL LEMIEUX
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHITE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Staszak v. DOJ
as 24-5081
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Staszak
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
BOBULINSKI v. GOLDMAN
as 1:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BOBULINSKI
Defendant:
DANIEL GOLDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
JENKINS v. RHODE ISLAND STATE et al
as 1:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND STATE, UPS STORE #7051, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ALVARENGA v. 2815 M ST, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALVARENGA and MIGUEL ALVARENGA
Defendant:
2815 M ST, LLC doing business as VILLA YARA, RAMZI ADNAN ISKANDAR and MAJED M. SAADI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
