Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Daniel Le Clerc, Sr. v. John Guy, et al
as 24-11047
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LE CLERC, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN I. GUY and MARK R. MILLER
LeClerc v. Branham
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen LeClerc
Defendant:
Jeb T. Branham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le Clerc v. Guy et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
John I. Guy and Mark R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le Clerc, Sr. v. Kuiper
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
B.J. Kuiper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenoir et al v. Duval County Jail
as 3:2023cv01330
Plaintiff:
Rex D. Lenoir, Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr., Anthony Walton and others
Defendant:
Duval County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAUERLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13820
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN HAUERLAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANTRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13222
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LANTRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BYERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10340
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN BYERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24407
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN GARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
