Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ortiz et al v. Pofi Construction, Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv07202
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz, Jorge Mendoza and Erlin Mendoza
Defendant:
Pofi Construction, Corp. and Porfirio Benjamin Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl
Torres et al v. Mukhamedov
as 1:2021cv01387
Plaintiff:
Miguel Herreros Torres and Juan Daniel Ortiz Reyes
Defendant:
Farrukh Mukhamedov
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Torres et al v. 894 Deklab Pizza Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv05750
Plaintiff:
Miguel Herreros Torres and Juan Daniel Ortiz Reyes
Defendant:
894 Deklab Pizza Corp. and Roberto "Doe"
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2010cv00329
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Ortiz, Daniel Ortiz and DLO Bar & Restaurant Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
Elmaghraby et al v. Ashcroft et al
as 1:2004cv01809
Plaintiff:
Javaid Iqbal and Ehab Elmaghraby
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Scott Roseberry, David Rardin, Corrections Officer Michael Defrancisco and others
Counter Claimant:
Corrections Officer Reynaldo Alamo
Cross Claimant:
Corrections Officer Jai Jaikisson
Interested Party:
Ibrahim Turkmen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turkmen et al v. Ashcroft et al
as 1:2002cv02307
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ahmer Abbasi, Anser Mehmood, Benamar Benatta and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Robert Mueller, James W. Ziglar and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
