Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Assn of Civilian Technicians, et al v. USA, et al
as 09-5153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Association of Civilian Technicians, Inc., Laborers' International Union of North America, Daniel Romero Cruz and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, In his official capacity, John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army, In his official capacity and others
Romero et al v. Borden East River Realty LLC
as 1:2009cv00665
Plaintiff:
Daniel Romero and Joann Ragusa
Defendant:
Borden East River Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oscar Machado v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabiliation et al
as 2:2008cv04947
Plaintiff:
Oscar Machado
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabiliation, R. J. Dottaviano, Kevin Neville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Romero et al v. Amtrak et al
as 3:2008cv00540
Plaintiff:
Danielle Romero, Danielle Romero, Randy Cordova and others
Defendant:
Amtrak, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS INC et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv01747
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS INC, LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, DANIEL ROMERO CRUZ and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETER GEREN and H. STEVEN BLUM
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (B) Agency Action Review
USA v. Tapia-Romero
as 05-50121
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FELIPE DANIEL TAPIA-ROMERO, a/k/a David Perales Meraz, Daniel Pato, Felipe Daniel Pato, Felipe Romero Pato, Felipe Romero, Felipe Daniel Romero, Daniel Sanchez, Danny Tapia, Felipe Tapia, Felipe Daniel Tapia, Felipe Romero Tapia, Felipe Daniel Topia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
