Cases 1 - 10 of 39
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33966
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34148
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Daniel Clark
as 23-12802
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL CLARK
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21335
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03459
Plaintiff:
HERBERT DANIEL CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harbor Breeze AMI, LLC et al v. City of Holmes Beach, Florida et al
as 8:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
Harbor Breeze AMI, LLC, James Daniel Clark and Justin Daniel Clark
Defendant:
City of Holmes Beach, Florida and William L. Tokajer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65807
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. AEARO HOLDING LLC et al
as 7:2021cv54833
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27161
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
