Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America for the use and benefit of Casas Construction v. Sierra Range Construction et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Sierra Range Construction
Plaintiff:
Casas Construction
Counter Defendant:
Daniel J. Casas
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
UNITED STATES, For the Use of BOWEN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL, a California General Partnership et al v. Hal Hays Construction, Inc., a California corporation et al
as 1:2020at00660
Plaintiff:
Bowen Engineering and Environmental, Daniel E Bowen, Erik Bowen and others
Defendant:
Hal Hays Construction, Inc., a California corporation and Western Surety Company, a South Dakota corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States et al v. Hal Hays Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01256
Plaintiff:
United States, Erik Bowen, Bowen Engineering and Environmental and others
Defendant:
Western Surety Company and Hal Hays Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Schaeffer v. MBR Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01177
Defendant:
MBR Associates, Inc., The Guarantee Company of North America USA and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use of Daniel Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America, for the use of Daniel Schaeffer v. MBR Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01169
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use of Daniel Schaeffer
Defendant:
MBR Associates, Inc., The Guarantee Company of North America USA and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Araujo v. W.E. Lyons Construction et al
as 3:2010cv04028
Plaintiff:
Daniel Araujo
Defendant:
W.E. Lyons Construction and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Araujo v. W.E. Lyons Construction et al
as 4:2010cv04028
Plaintiff:
Daniel Araujo
Defendant:
W.E. Lyons Construction and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
