Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lucky v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lucky
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Daniel and Robert A Daniel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00098
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
David Kenneth Daniel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schwarz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2017cv02030
Plaintiff:
Daniel Schwarz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Danielle R Thomson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Danielle Thomson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owen Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kopecky v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Kopecky
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2013cv02014
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
