Social Security Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Armstrong-Castrodale v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv02151
Plaintiff: Danielle M. Armstrong-Castrodale
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kobs v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv00743
Defendant: Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Kobs and Danielle M. Kobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Kobs v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv00561
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Danielle M. Kobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Bogguess v. Saul
as 0:2019cv02649
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Dominique Danielle Bogguess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
McGrath v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv03296
Plaintiff: Daniel Joseph McGrath
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stolp v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv03069
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward Stolp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv02803
Plaintiff: Michael Daniel
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Intervenor: Pro Se Project
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Clark v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv02695
Plaintiff: Daniel Clark
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Myra v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv00792
Plaintiff: Daniel Olaves Myra
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Anderson v. Berryhill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2017cv04322
Plaintiff: Daniel T. Anderson
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?