Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 662
Johnson v. Maxar Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00383
Plaintiff: Mary Jo Johnson
Defendant: Maxar Technologies, Inc., Daniel L. Jablonsky, Howell M. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Skurkey v. Daniel, et al
as 23-6014
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN V. SKURKEY
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM DANIEL, PAUL E. QUIGLEY and ANNE THOMAS
United States v. Daniel
as 23-6011
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM JOSEPH DANIEL
Taylor v. Willis et al
as 1:2023cv00127
Plaintiff: Daniel Taylor
Defendant: Brent Willis, Fred Cooper, Tim Haas and others
Petitioner: Damian Betebenner, Cigdem Betebenner and Chris Dobson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Bill.com v. Cox We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00026
Plaintiff: Bill.com
Defendant: Danielle Cox
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00821
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States v. Daniels
as 22-1378
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: LYNDELL DANIELS
Watson v. Kansas Employment Security Board of Review We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02438
Plaintiff: Aaliyah Danielle Watson
Defendant: Kansas Employment Security Board of Review
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
United States v. Archuleta
as 22-2104
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL ARCHULETA, AKA Smurf
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?