Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,227
Li, et al. v. Arcsoft, Inc., et al.
as 24-2531
Plaintiff: LEI LI, an individual, STRONG WEALTH INVESTMENT LIMITED, a British Virgin Islands Company and PACIFIC SMILE LIMITED, a British Virgin Islands Company
Defendant: ARCSOFT, INC., a California Corporation, MICHAEL DENG, an individual, DANIEL MACKEIGAN, an individual and others
Alotaibi v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-2523
Petitioner: MAZEN ALOTAIBI
Respondent: NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, CHARLES DANIELS and LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Asimba v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff: Maureen Achieng Asimba
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00823
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant: WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Daniel Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff: Daniel Grant
Defendant: Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2365
Plaintiff: TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant: ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Loyd v. Alvarez, et al.
as 24-2374
Plaintiff: DANIEL RAY LOYD
Defendant: V. ALVAREZ, M.D., W. PAYNE and BRYANT, Sgt.
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2358
Plaintiff: TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant: ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?