Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Anderson et al v. Todisco Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11567
Plaintiff:
Natalie Anderson and Andre Bisasor
Defendant:
Todisco Services Inc., Pasquale III Todisco, Matthew Mazzarella and others
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Kenneth P. Neiman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Victor v. Orozco et al
as 1:2022cv11348
Plaintiff:
Danielle Victor
Defendant:
Judge Yolanda Orozco, Paul Marciano, Judge Linda Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wapner et al v. HKAllen Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2016cv12077
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wapner , Mickey Wapner , James Lippman and others
Defendant:
HKAllen Limited Partnership, HK Allen, Inc., HKN Allen LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Daniel Hale v. DraftKings Inc, et al
as 1:2016cv10339
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HALE
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc. and FanDuel Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Silva et al v. DFRF Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv10670
Plaintiff:
Jose Silva and Carlos Santos
Defendant:
DFRF Enterprises, LLC, Daniel Rojo Filho, Veliton Marcus Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cox v. Rushie et al
as 1:2013cv11308
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox
Defendant:
Jordan Rushie, Mulvihill and Rushie LLC, Roxanne Grinage and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Operator Tactical Boots, LLC et al v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv12193
Plaintiff:
Operator Tactical Boots, LLC and G. Albert Hreish
Defendant:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. , Ellis Global Footwear LLC, Daniel Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Operator Tactical Boots, LLC et al v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv12193
Plaintiff:
Operator Tactical Boots, LLC and G. Albert Hreish
Defendant:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. , Ellis Global Footwear LLC, Daniel Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
