Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Ruiz et al v. Amigos Bar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
Danielle Ruiz, Claudia Sampedro, JESSICA "JESSA&quo HINTON and others
Defendant:
Amigos Bar, Inc. doing business as LOS AMIGOS SPORT BAR, JAVIER NAVARRO and CARLOS SOTEL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Compass Marketing, Inc. v. Flywheel Digital LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Compass Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Flywheel Digital LLC, James Columbus DiPaula, Jr., Patrick Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rouse et al v. LeMay et al
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Latasha Rouse, Exabia Rouse, Daniel Riley and others
Defendant:
George LeMay and Lawrence J Hogan
Egahi v. Garland et al.
as 1:2021cv02938
Plaintiff:
Sunday Egahi
Defendant:
DHS, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Menjivar et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lennis Landaverde Menjivar, Fernando Turcios Escobar, Ada Rodas Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Wojcik v. Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03491
Defendant:
Ben W. Perks, Daniel J. Booth, Kapila K. Anand and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wojcik
Snyder v. Ferguson
as 1:2020cv03299
Respondent:
Shawn Ferguson
Petitioner:
Daniel Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Snyder v. Moag & Co., LLC
as 1:2020cv02705
Respondent:
Moag & Co., LLC
Petitioner:
Daniel Synder and Daniel Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Daniel Hine, III et al v. State of Maryland, et al.
as 1:2020cv01285
Plaintiff:
Cocobuns Tanning Inc. and Daniel Hine, III
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Robert J. Neall, Michael T. Pedone and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
